4.7 Article

Nitrogen concentration and nitrate/ammonium ratio affect yield and change the oxalic acid concentration and fatty acid profile of purslane (Portulaca oleracea L.) grown in a soilless culture system

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE SCIENCE OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE
卷 86, 期 14, 页码 2417-2424

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.2633

关键词

nitrogen; fertilization; nutraceuticals; purslane; functional food; omega-3 fatty acid

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purslane is an excellent source of omega-3 fatty acids, amino acids and vitamins. The aim of this research was to study the effect of different nitrogen levels and NO3--N/NH4+-N ratios in the nutrient solution on the yield and on the oxalic acid content and fatty acid profile in purslane grown in a soilless culture system. Two experiments were carried out to test different levels of nitrogen: (1) 8-12-16 mmol L-1 and (2) 0-12-24-36 mmol L-1. A third experiment was carried out maintaining the N level fixed (12 mmol L-1) but varying the NO3--N/NH4+-N ratio: 60:40, 40:60, 0:100. The results indicated that plants grew with increasing nitrogen level up to 36 mmol L-1. Nitrogen supplied in both NO3- and NH4+ forms produced bigger plants than N supplied in NH4+ form only. Nitrogen did not significantly influence the polyunsaturated fatty acid content in the canopy. Significant trends were found for alpha-linolenic acid (LNA; 18:3 n-3) and linoleic acid (LA; 18:2 n-6), indicating a favorable accumulation of omega-3 fatty acids with increasing N; palmitic acid decreased by increasing N and by switching the NO3-/NH4+ ratio towards the NH4+ level in the nutrient solution, but using 0:100 NO3-/NH4+, decreased plant quality. Increasing N lowered oxalic acid production and palmitic acid content, enhancing purslane nutritional quality. Keeping a high N level in the nutrient solution with a 40:60 NO3-/NH4+ ratio would give the best results in terms of yield, oxalic acid concentration and fatty acid profile. (c) 2006 Society of Chemical Industry.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据