4.0 Article

Pulkovo Compilation of Radial Velocities for 35 495 Hipparcos stars in a common system

出版社

MAIK NAUKA/INTERPERIODICA/SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1134/S1063773706110065

关键词

Galaxy; radial velocities; stellar kinematics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Pulkovo Compilation of Radial Velocities (PCRV) has been made to study the stellar kinematics in the local spiral arm. The PCRV contains weighted mean absolute radial velocities for 35 495 Hipparcos stars of various spectral types and luminosity classes over the entire celestial sphere mainly within 500 pc of the Sun. The median accuracy of the radial velocities obtained is 0.7 km s(-1). Results from 203 publications were used in the catalogue. Four of them were used to improve the radial velocities of standard stars from the IAU list. The radial velocities of 155 standard stars turned out to be constant within 0.3 km s(-1). These stars were used to analyze 47 768 mean radial velocities for 37 200 stars from 12 major publications (similar to 80% of all the data used). Zero-point discrepancies and systematic dependences on radial velocity, B-V color index, right ascension, and declination were found in radial velocity differences of the form publication minus IAU list of standards. These discrepancies and dependences were approximated and taken into account when calculating the weighted mean radial velocities. 1128 stars whose independent radial-velocity determinations were available at least in three of these publications and agreed within 3 km s(-1) were chosen as the work list of secondary standards. Radial-velocity differences of the form publication minus list of secondary standards were used by analogy to correct the zero points and systematic dependences in the radial velocities from 33 more publications (similar to 13% of the data used). In addition, the radial velocities from 154 minor publications (similar to 7% of the data used) pertaining to well-known instruments were used without any corrections.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据