4.7 Article

Three-year outcomes in deep brain stimulation for highly resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder

期刊

NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 31, 期 11, 页码 2384-2393

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/sj.npp.1301165

关键词

deep brain stimulation; obsessive-compulsive disorder; internal capsule; long-term treatment; neurosurgery

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Deep brain stimulation ( DBS) of the anterior limb of the internal capsule has been shown to be beneficial in the short term for obsessive-compulsive disorder ( OCD) patients who exhaust conventional therapies. Nuttin et al, who published the first DBS for OCD series, found promising results using a capsule target immediately rostral to the anterior commissure extending into adjacent ventral capsule/ventral striatum ( VC/VS). Published long-term outcome data are limited to four patients. In this collaborative study, 10 adult OCD patients meeting stringent criteria for severity and treatment resistance had quadripolar stimulating leads implanted bilaterally in the VC/VS. DBS was activated openly 3 weeks later. Eight patients have been followed for at least 36 months. Group Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale ( YBOCS) scores decreased from 34.6 +/- 0.6 ( mean +/- SEM) at baseline ( severe) to 22.3 +/- 2.1 ( moderate) at 36 months ( p < 0.001). Four of eight patients had a >= 35% decrease in YBOCS severity at 36 months; in two patients, scores declined between 25 and 35%. Global Assessment of Functioning scores improved from 36.6 +/- 1.5 at baseline to 53.8 +/- 2.5 at 36 months ( p < 0.001). Depression and anxiety also improved, as did self-care, independent living, and work, school, and social functioning. Surgical adverse effects included an asymptomatic hemorrhage, a single seizure, and a superficial infection. Psychiatric adverse effects included transient hypomanic symptoms, and worsened depression and OCD when DBS was interrupted by stimulator battery depletion. This open study found promising long-term effects of DBS in highly treatment-resistant OCD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据