4.7 Article

Zinc absorption during late pregnancy in rural southern Ethiopia

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION
卷 84, 期 5, 页码 1102-1106

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/84.5.1102

关键词

zinc; absorption; phytate; pregnancy; Ethiopia

资金

  1. FIC NIH HHS [R21 TW006729] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [M01 RR00069, M01 RR000069] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Little is yet known about zinc absorption in late pregnancy, and no information on absorption from the total diet is available. Objective: The objective was to measure the fractional absorption of zinc (FAZ) and to estimate the total quantity of absorbed zinc (TAZ) each day during the third trimester of pregnancy in poor rural southern Ethiopian women. Design: The participants (n = 17) were a convenience sample from a larger study population. The third stage of pregnancy was estimated from fundal height by the Bushulo Health Center prenatal outreach program. FAZ was determined with a dual-isotope tracer ratio technique that uses measurements of urine enrichment with zinc stable isotopes administered intravenously and orally, as an extrinsic label, with all meals in 1 d. Total dietary zinc (TDZ) was calculated from weighed diet records and Ethiopian food-composition tables supported by zinc and phytate analyses of major food items for individual meals. Plasma zinc and exchangeable zinc pool size were also estimated. Results: Mean (+/- SD) FAZ was 0.35 +/- 0.11, TDZ was 6.0 +/- 3.2 mg/d, TAZ was 2.1 +/- 1.0 mg/d, phytate intake was 1033 +/- 843 mg/d, plasma zinc was 44.1 +/- 6.0 mu g/dL, and the exchangeable zinc pool size was 142 +/- 39 mg. The molar ratio of phytate to zinc was 17:1. Conclusions: Women from a poor rural population who were dependent on a moderately high-phytate diet had low TDZ and low plasma zinc concentrations in the third trimester of pregnancy. TAZ was modestly higher than that predicted but did not meet physiologic requirements.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据