4.6 Article

Hydrologic flowpaths influence inorganic and organic nutrient leaching in a forest soil

期刊

BIOGEOCHEMISTRY
卷 81, 期 2, 页码 191-204

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10533-006-9036-4

关键词

soil solution; throughfall; dissolved organic nitrogen; dissolved organic carbon; nitrate; cations; hydrogen isotopes; lysimeters; flowpaths; contact time

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrologic pathways through soil affect element leaching by determining the relative importance of biogeochemical processes such as sorption and decomposition. We used stable hydrogen isotopes of water (delta D) to examine the influence of flowpaths on soil solution chemistry in a mature spruce-hemlock forest in coastal Oregon, USA. Soil solutions (50 cm depth, n = 13) were collected monthly for 1 year and analyzed for delta D, major ions and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) and nitrogen (DON). We propose that the variability of delta D can be used as an index of flowpath length and contact time. Throughfall variability in delta D was much greater than soil solution variability, illustrating that soil solution integrates the variation in inputs. Lysimeters with greater variation in delta D presumably have a greater proportion of flow through rapid flowpaths such as macropores. The variation in soil solution delta D for individual lysimeters explained up to 53% of the variation in soil solution chemistry, and suggests that flowpaths influence leaching of some constituents. Soil solutions from lysimeters with greater delta D variation had higher DOC and DON (r(2) = 0.51 and 0.37, respectively), perhaps because transport via macropores reduces interaction of DOM with the soil matrix. In contrast, nitrate concentrations were highest in lysimeters with a small variation in delta D, where long contact time and low DOC concentrations may yield higher net nitrification. Our results demonstrate the utility of stable isotopes to link flowpaths and soil solution chemistry, and illustrate how the spatial complexity of soils can influence ecosystem-level nutrient losses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据