4.7 Article

3D comparison of hippocampal atrophy in amnestic mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease

期刊

BRAIN
卷 129, 期 -, 页码 2867-2873

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/brain/awl274

关键词

hippocampus; atrophy; Alzheimer's disease; mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. NCRR NIH HHS [RR019771, P41 RR013642, U54 RR021813] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIA NIH HHS [AG16570, K23 AG026803] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIBIB NIH HHS [EB01651] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH071940] Funding Source: Medline
  5. NLM NIH HHS [LM05639] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alzheimer's disease is the most common neurodegenerative disorder in the elderly. Amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a relatively newly defined clinical entity that requires memory decline while activities of daily living remain intact. Most amnestic MCI patients develop Alzheimer's disease. Using an innovative surface-based hippocampal analytic technique we analysed the structural magnetic resonance hippocampal data of 31 amnestic MCI and 34 Alzheimer's disease subjects. We tested the hypothesis that Alzheimer's disease subjects have greater atrophy of the CA1, CA2 and CA3 hippocampal subfields relative to amnestic MCI subjects. 3D hippocampal maps localized the main group differences to the CA1 region bilaterally and the CA2 and CA3 region on the right (left P = 0.0024, right P = 0.0002, both corrected for multiple comparisons). Age, race, gender, education and Mini-Mental State Examination were significant predictors of hippocampal volume. Hippocampal volume was a significant predictor of clinical diagnosis. Our study suggests that as Alzheimer's disease progresses, subregional hippocampal atrophy spreads in a pattern that follows the known trajectory of neurofibrillary tangle dissemination. Novel hippocampal analytic techniques that can track the spread of hippocampal pathology in 3D with such precision are a promising research tool.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据