4.5 Article

Remediation of Urban River Water by Pontederia Cordata Combined with Artificial Aeration: Organic Matter and Nutrients Removal and Root-Adhered Bacterial Communities

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHYTOREMEDIATION
卷 17, 期 11, 页码 1105-1114

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15226514.2015.1045121

关键词

aeration; macrophyte; nitrogen; phosphorus; bacterial diversity; grey relational analysis

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51278192, 41101471]
  2. National Science and Technology Major Project of China on Water Pollution Treatment and Control [2013ZX07310-001, 2014ZX07101-012]
  3. Program of Shanghai Subject Chief Scientist [11XD1402100]
  4. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [12231201900]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophyte combined with artificial aeration is a promising in situ remediation approach for urban rivers polluted with nutrients and organic matter. However, seasonal variations and aeration effects on phytoremediation performance and root-adhered microbial communities are still unclear. In this study, Pontederia cordata was used to treat polluted urban river water under various aeration intensities. Results showed that the highest removal efficiencies of chemical oxygen demand (CODCr) and total nitrogen (TN) were attained under aeration of 30 L min(-1) in spring and summer and 15 L min(-1) in autumn, while total phosphorus (TP) removal reached maximum with aeration of 15 L min(-1) in all seasons. Moderate aeration was beneficial for increasing the diversity of root-adhered bacteria communities, and the shift of bacterial community structure was more pronounced in spring and autumn with varying aeration intensity. The dual effect, i.e. turbulence and dissolved oxygen (DO), of aeration on the removal of CODCr and TN prevailed over the individual effect of DO, while DO was the most influential factor for TP removal and the root-adhered bacterial community diversity. P. cordata combined with 15 L min(-1) aeration was deemed to be the best condition tested in this study.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据