4.4 Article

Inhibitory postsynaptic potentials in lumbar motoneurons remain depolarizing after neonatal spinal cord transection in the rat

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
卷 96, 期 5, 页码 2274-2281

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00328.2006

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

GABA and glycine are excitatory in the immature spinal cord and become inhibitory during development. The shift from depolarizing to hyperpolarizing inhibitory postsynaptic potentials (IPSPs) occurs during the perinatal period in the rat, a time window during which the projections from the brain stem reach the lumbar enlargement. In this study, we investigated the effects of suppressing influences of the brain on lumbar motoneurons during this critical period for the negative shift of the reversal potential of IPSPs (E-IPSP). The spinal cord was transected at the thoracic level on the day of birth [postnatal day 0 (P0)]. E-IPSP, at P4-P7, was significantly more depolarized in cord-transected than in cord-intact animals (E-IPSP above and below resting potential, respectively). EIPSP at P4-P7 in cord-transected animals was close to E-IPSP at P0-P2. K-Cl cotransporter KCC2 immunohistochemistry revealed a developmental increase of staining in the area of lumbar motoneurons between P0 and P7 in cord-intact animals; this increase was not observed after spinal cord transection. The motoneurons recorded from cord-transected animals were less sensitive to the experimental manipulations aimed at testing the functionality of the KCC2 system, which is sensitive to [K+](o) and blocked by bumetanide. Although bumetanide significantly depolarized E-IPSP, the shift was less pronounced than in cord-intact animals. In addition, a reduction of [K+](o) affected E-IPSP significantly only in cord-intact animals. Therefore influences from the brain stem may play an essential role in the maturation of inhibitory synaptic transmission, possibly by upregulating KCC2 and its functionality.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据