4.5 Article

Flow structure of wake behind a rotationally oscillating circular cylinder

期刊

JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES
卷 22, 期 8, 页码 1097-1112

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2006.07.008

关键词

rotational oscillation; forcing frequency; cylinder wake; lock-on regime; drag reduction; flow control

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Flow around a circular cylinder oscillating rotationally with a relatively high forcing frequency has been investigated experimentally. The dominant parameters affecting this experiment are the Reynolds number (Re), oscillation amplitude (theta(A)), and frequency ratio F-R = f(f)/f(n), where f(f) is the forcing frequency and f(n) is the natural frequency of vortex shedding. Experiments were carried out under conditions of Re = 4.14 x 10(3), 0 degrees <=theta(A)<= 60 degrees and 0.0 <= F-R <= 2.0. Rotational oscillation of the cylinder significantly modified the flow structure in the near-wake. Depending on the frequency ratio F-R, the cylinder wake showed five different flow regimes, each with a distinct wake structure. The vortex formation length and the vortex shedding frequency were greatly changed before and after the lock-on regime where vortices shed at the same frequency as the forcing frequency. The lock-on phenomenon always occurred at F-R = 1.0 and the frequency range of the lock-on regime expanded with increasing oscillation amplitude theta(A), In addition, the drag coefficient was reduced when the frequency ratio FR was less than 1.0 (F-R < 1.0) while fixing the oscillation amplitude at theta(A) = 30 degrees. When the oscillation amplitude theta(A) was used as a control parameter at a fixed frequency ratio F-R = 1.0 (lock-on regime), the drag reduction effect was observed at all oscillation amplitudes except for the case of theta(A) = 30 degrees. This type of active flow control method can be used effectively in aerodynamic applications while optimizing the forcing parameters. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据