4.7 Article

Modulation of ceramide metabolism enhances viral protein Apoptin's cytotoxicity in prostate cancer

期刊

MOLECULAR THERAPY
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 637-646

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2006.06.005

关键词

prostate cancer; Apoptin; ceramide; acid ceramidase; cancer gene therapy; LCL204; apoptosis; acid ceramidase inhibitor

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [1R24CA82933, P01 CA97132] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NCRR NIH HHS [C06 RR015455] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIMHD NIH HHS [N6311601MD10004] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite local and systemic therapies, the National Cancer Institute estimates that prostate cancer will cause over 30,000 deaths in 2006. This suggests that additional therapeutic approaches are needed. The chicken anemia viral protein Apoptin causes tumor-selective apoptosis in human tumor lines independent of p53 and Bcl-2 status. Tet-regulated expression of Apoptin from an adenoviral vector showed cytotoxicity in DU145, PC-3, and LNCaP tumor cells regardless of expression of p53, Bcl-2, Bcl-xL, Bax, survivin, FLIPS, XIAP, or CIAP. Apoptin expression caused an increase in the tumor suppressor lipid ceramide, which regulates the cellular stress response. Interestingly, 10 of 15 primary prostate cancers examined by Western blotting overexpressed acid ceramidase (AC), suggesting that ceramide deacylation might serve to negate elevated levels of ceramide, creating a more antiapoptotic phenotype. This was confirmed in AC-overexpressing cells in which we observed decreased sensitivity to apoptosis following treatment with Apoptin. Addition of the AC inhibitor LCL204, in combination with Apoptin, augmented cell killing. This effect was also demonstrated in vivo in that Apoptin and LCL204 cotreatment significantly reduced tumor growth in DU145 xenografts (P<0.05). Taken together, our data demonstrated that Apoptin is a promising therapeutic agent for prostate cancer and that its function is improved when combined with acid ceramidase inhibitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据