4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

N-acetyltransferase (Nat) 1 and 2 expression in Nat2 knockout mice

期刊

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/jpet.106.108662

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01-CA34627, R01 CA034627-21] Funding Source: Medline
  2. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Arylamine N-acetyltransferases (Nat) 1 and 2 catalyze the N-acetylation of aromatic amine and hydrazine drugs and carcinogens. After N-hydroxylation, they also catalyze the metabolic activation of N-hydroxy-arylamines via O-acetylation. Functional characterization of mouse Nat1 and Nat2 was investigated in an Nat2 knockout (KO) model and compared with the wild-type (WT) strain. Nat1-and Nat2-specific mRNA, determined by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction, was detected in all tissues examined and did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between Nat2 KO and WT mice. Nat1 catalytic activity was present in all tissues examined and did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) between the Nat2 KO and WT mice. In contrast, Nat2 catalytic activity was present in all tissues examined from male WT mice but was below the limit of detection in all tissues of Nat2 KO mice. N-acetyltransferase activity toward the aromatic amine carcinogen 4-aminobiphenyl and O-acetyltransferase activity toward its proximate metabolite N-hydroxy-4-aminobiphenyl were both present in tissue cytosols of WT mice but were undetectable in Nat2 KO mice. Nat2 protein was readily detectable in liver cytosols of WT mice but not in liver cytosols from Nat2 KO mice. Since the reductions in Nat2 activity correlated with reductions in Nat2-specific protein but not mRNA, these results strongly suggest that insertion of the LacZ ablation cassette eliminated Nat2 protein and catalytic activity via disruption of the Nat2 protein, without significantly affecting transcription rates or transcript stability. The Nat2 KO model will be useful in future studies to assess the role of Nat2 in arylamine carcinogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据