4.8 Article

Solvent effects in thermodynamically controlled multicomponent nanocage syntheses

期刊

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY
卷 128, 期 43, 页码 14120-14127

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/ja0644733

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The solvent effects on the condensation reaction between tetraformylcavitand 2 and ethylene-1,2-diamine 3 are reported. Earlier, it was found that the trifluoroacetic acid-catalyzed condensation of 2 and 2 equiv of 3 in CHCl3 provides in 82% yield an octahedral nanocage 1 composed of 6 cavitands that are linked together by 12-CH=N-CH2CH2-N=CH- linker groups (Liu, X.; Liu, Y.; Li, G.; Warmuth, R. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 901). In tetrahydrofuran, the same reactants yield a tetrameric nanocage 4 (35% yield), which resembles a distorted tetrahedron built up from four cavitands that occupy the apexes. Each cavitand is doubly linked to one other cavitand and singly linked to the other two cavitands via - CH = N - CH2CH2N = CH - connectors. In CH2Cl2, the reaction between 8 2 and 16 3 yields a square antiprismatic nanocage 5 (65% yield), in which each cavitand occupies one of the eight corners and is connected to four neighboring cavitands via -CH=N-CH2CH2-N=CH- linkers. Nanocage 5 is also the main product in CH2ClCH2Cl (26% yield) and CHCl2CHCl2 (33% yield). Reduction of all imine bonds in 4 and 5 yields polyaminonanocontainers 7 and 8, respectively, which were isolated as trifluoroacetate salts. Contrary to the formation of larger capsules composed of four, six, or eight cavitands in the reaction between 2 and 3, the acid-catalyzed reaction of 2 with 2 equiv of H2N-X-NH2 (X=(CH2)(n=3,4,5,)1,3-C6H4, 1,4-(CH2)(2)C6H4, or 1,3-(CH2)(2)C6H4) quantitatively yields octaiminohemicarcerands 9- 14, in which two cavitands are connected with four -CHdN-X-NdCH-linkers. The outcomes of these condensation reactions are rationalized with the different diamine structures and the relative orientation of cavitands in 1, 4, 5, and 9-14.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据