4.5 Article

Heterogeneity of nicotinic cholinergic receptors in rat superior cervical and nodose ganglia

期刊

MOLECULAR PHARMACOLOGY
卷 70, 期 5, 页码 1693-1699

出版社

AMER SOC PHARMACOLOGY EXPERIMENTAL THERAPEUTICS
DOI: 10.1124/mol.106.027458

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDA NIH HHS [DA12976] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nicotinic cholinergic receptors ( nAChRs) are present in ganglia in the peripheral nervous system. In autonomic ganglia, they are responsible for fast synaptic transmission, whereas in the sensory ganglia and sensory neurons, they may be involved in modulation of neurotransmission. The present study measured nAChRs in several rat autonomic ganglia: the superior cervical ganglia ( SCG), sensory nodose ganglia, stellate ganglia, and pelvic ganglia. The densities of the heteromeric nAChRs determined by receptor binding assay in those four ganglia are 481, 45, 9, and 11 fmol/mg protein, respectively. Immunoprecipitation studies with subunit-specific antibodies showed that a majority of the nAChRs in the SCG and nodose ganglia contain the alpha 3 and beta 4 subunits, but a significant percentage of the nAChRs in these ganglia also contain alpha 5 and beta 2 subunits. A small percentage of the nAChRs in nodose ganglia also contain beta 2 and beta 4 subunits. Sequential immunoprecipitation assays indicated that in the SCG, all alpha 5 subunits are associated with alpha 3 and beta 4 subunits, forming the mixed heteromeric alpha 3 beta 4 alpha 5 subtype. A receptor composed of alpha 3, beta 2, and beta 4 subunits in the SCG was also detected. In rat SCG, we found the following distribution of nAChRs subtypes: 55 to 60% simple alpha 3 beta 4 subtype, 25 to 30% alpha 3 beta 4 alpha 5 subtype, and 10 to 15% alpha 3 beta 4 alpha 2 subtype. These findings indicate that the nAChRs in SCG and nodose ganglia are heterogeneous, which suggests that different receptor subtypes may play different roles in these ganglia or may be activated under different conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据