4.5 Review

Zinc-binding proteins (metallothionein and α-2 macroglobulin) and immunosenescence

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
卷 41, 期 11, 页码 1094-1107

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2006.08.010

关键词

metallothionein; alpha-2 macroglobulin; zinc; genetic marker; immunosenescence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Zinc is a relevant trace element for the efficiency of the entire immune system. The binding of zinc with some proteins, such as metal-lothioneins (MT) and alpha-2 macroglobulin (alpha-2M) is crucial for the immune efficiency during ageing and in age-related diseases, because these proteins may be involved in antagonistic pleiotropic effects. Indeed, the presence of chronic inflammation during ageing, generally, induces overexpression of these proteins that, due to their original biological function in fighting stressor agents, continuously sequester intracellular zinc. As a consequence, a low zinc ion availability may appear in aged organisms leading to impairments of the immune response at thymic and extrathymic levels with the risk of the appearance of age-related diseases. Therefore, MT and a-2M turn from protective in young-adult age to harmful agents in ageing following the basic assumption of an evolutionary theory of ageing, named the antagonistic pleiotropy, which suggests that a trade off between early beneficial effects and late negative outcomes can occur at a genetic and molecular level. On the other hand, some polymorphisms of MT (MT2A) and a-2M have been associated with atherosclerosis or Alzheimer disease, respectively. Physiological zinc supplementation in elderly restores the thymic endocrine activity and innate immune response (NK cell cytotoxicity) and increases the survival rate in old mice. Therefore, zinc supplementation is useful to achieve health longevity because these zinc-binding proteins may regain their original protective task against oxidative damage with, thus, a beneficial impact on immune response. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据