4.6 Article

Inhibition of tumor endothelial ERK activation, angiogenesis, and tumor growth by sorafenib (BAY43-9006)

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PATHOLOGY
卷 169, 期 5, 页码 1875-1885

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.2353/ajpath.2006.050711

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA99519, R01 CA77851, R01 CA099519, R01 CA077851] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDDK NIH HHS [P30 DK50306, P30 DK050306] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Activation of the Raf-MEK-ERK signal transduction pathway in endothelial cells is required for angiogenesis. Raf is the kinase most efficiently inhibited by the multikinase inhibitor sorafenib, which has shown activity against certain human cancers in clinical trials. To understand the mechanisms underlying this activity, we studied how it controlled growth of K1735 murine melanomas. Therapy caused massive regional tumor cell death accompanied by severe tumor hypoxia, decreased microvessel density, increased percentage of pericyte-covered vessels, and increased caliber and decreased arborization of vessels. These signs of K1735 angiogenesis inhibition, along with its ability to inhibit Matrigel neovascularization, showed that sorafenib is an effective antiangiogenic agent. Extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) activation in tumor endothelial cells, revealed by immunostaining for phospho-ERK and CD34, was inhibited, whereas AKT activation, revealed by phospho-AKT immunostaining, was not inhibited in K1735 and two other tumor types treated with sorafenib. Treatment decreased endothelial but not tumor cell proliferation and increased both endothelial cell and tumor cell apoptosis. These data indicate that sorafenib's anti-tumor efficacy may be primarily attributable to angiogenesis inhibition resulting from its inhibition of Raf-MEEK-ERK signaling in endothelial cells. Assessing endothelial cell ERK activation in tumor biopsies may provide mechanistic insights into and allow monitoring of sorafenib's activity in patients in clinical trials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据