4.1 Article

Further development of the postpartum depression predictors inventory-revised

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/J.1552-6909.2006.00094.x

关键词

postpartum depression; postpartum depression predictors inventory-revised; risk factors; sensitivity; specificity

资金

  1. NINR NIH HHS [NR05311-01A2] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives: To describe the newly developed item coding and computation of the total score for the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised along with recommended cutoff points. Design: Methodologic research. Setting: Obstetrician and gynecologist offices in the Pacific Northwest. Participants: This longitudinal study included 139 women; the study began in the participant's third trimester of pregnancy and ended at 8 months after childbirth. Methods: The participants completed the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised in their third trimester of pregnancy and again at 2 and 6 months after childbirth. Postpartum depression symptoms were measured by the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale and psychiatric nurse practitioner interview at 2 and 6 months after childbirth. Main Outcome Measures: Sensitivity and specificity of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised at three points: prenatal and 2 and 6 months after childbirth. Results: The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that the Prenatal Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised performed well and explained 67% of the variance of postpartum depressive symptomatology as measured by Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores. The Prenatal Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised yielded a sensitivity of .76 and a specificity of .54 at a cutoff score of 10.5. Conclusions: A cutoff score of 10.5 is recommended when using the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised during pregnancy. Further research needs to be conducted on recommended cutoff scores for use of the Postpartum Depression Predictors Inventory-Revised during the postpartum period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据