4.3 Article

Comparison of sample preparation methods for ChIP-chip assays

期刊

BIOTECHNIQUES
卷 41, 期 5, 页码 577-580

出版社

FUTURE SCI LTD
DOI: 10.2144/000112268

关键词

-

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA045240, CA45250, R01 CA045240-21] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NHGRI NIH HHS [R01 HG003129, R01 HG003129-03, HG003129] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDDK NIH HHS [R56 DK067889, R01 DK067889, DK067889, R01 DK067889-03] Funding Source: Medline
  4. PHS HHS [UCD FL69920] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A single chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) sample does not provide enough DNA for hybridization to a genomic tiling array. A commonly used technique for amplifying the DNA obtained from ChIP assays is ligation-mediated PCR (LM-PCR). However using this amplification method, we could not identify Oct4 binding sites on genomic tiling arrays representing 1% of the human genome (ENCODE arrays). In contrast, hybridization of a pool of 10 ChIP samples to the arrays produced reproducible binding patterns and low background signals. However the pooling method would greatly increase the number of ChIP reactions needed to analyze the entire human genome. Therefore, we have adapted the GenomePlex (R) whole genome amplification (WGA) method for use in ChIP-chip assays; detailed ChIP and amplification protocols used for these analyses are provided as supplementary material. When applied to ENCODE arrays, the products prepared using this new method resulted in an Oct4 binding pattern similar to that from the pooled Oct4 ChIP samples. Importantly, the signal-to-noise ratio using the GenomePlex WGA method is superior to the LM-PCR amplification method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据