4.7 Article

Long-term effects of amendment with liquid swine manure on proton binding behavior of soil humic substances

期刊

CHEMOSPHERE
卷 65, 期 8, 页码 1321-1329

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.04.026

关键词

acid-base properties; acidic functional groups; fulvic acids; humic acids; NICA-Donnan model; proton affinity distribution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The acid-base properties of humic acids (HAs) and fulvic acids (FAs) isolated from liquid swine manure (LSM), soils amended with either 90 or 150 m(3) ha(-1) year(-1) of LSM for 7 years, and the corresponding unamended control soil were investigated by a current potentiometric titration method. The non-ideal competitive adsorption (NICA)-Donnan model for proton binding by two classes of binding sites (i.e., carboxylic- and phenolic-type groups) was fit to titration data, and a set of fitting parameters was obtained for each HA and FA sample. The NICA-Donnan model was shown to describe with a great degree of accuracy the behavior of experimental titration datasets, and highlighted important differences in the acid-base properties of the HAs and FAs examined. When compared to the unamended soil HA and FA, LSM-HA and LSM-FA, had smaller acidic functional group contents, larger proton binding affinities of both carboxylic- and phenolic-type groups, smaller heterogeneity of carboxylic-type groups, and smaller, in the case of HA, or similar, in the case of FA, heterogeneity of phenolic-type groups. Amendment with LSM caused a decrease of acidic functional group contents and a slight increase of proton binding affinities of carboxylic- and phenolic-type groups of soil HAs and FAs. Further, LSM application induced a decrease of the heterogeneity of carboxylic-type groups, whereas appeared not to affect substantially the heterogeneity of phenolic-type groups of LSM-amended soil HAs and FAs. These effects were more evident for HAs than for FAs and tended to slightly increase with increasing LSM amendment rate. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据