4.7 Article

Increased ratio of CD31+/CD42- microparticles to endothelial progenitors as a novel marker of atherosclerosis in hypercholesterolemia

期刊

出版社

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/01.ATV.0000243941.72375.15

关键词

arterial stiffness; endothelial progenitor cells; hypercholesterolemia; microparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objectives - Atherosclerosis may be caused by increased endothelial damage and by a consumptive loss of endothelial repair capacity by endothelial progenitors. Arterial stiffness is a reliable marker of atherosclerosis and a positive correlate of endothelial damage. We investigated whether an increased ratio of CD31(+)/CD42(-) microparticles to endothelial progenitors, a possible indicator of endothelial damage and impaired endothelium reparation, may contribute to aortic stiffness in hypercholesterolemia. We also studied the in vitro effect of microparticles from hypercholesterolemic patients on endothelial progenitor survival. Methods and Results - Circulating CD31(+)/CD42(-) microparticles, endothelial progenitors, and aortic pulse wave velocity ( aPWV), a measure of aortic stiffness, were measured in 50 patients with never-treated hypercholesterolemia and 50 normocholesterolemic controls. Hypercholesterolemic patients had more circulating CD31(+)/CD42(-) microparticles, less endothelial progenitors, and a stiffer aorta than controls. aPWV was associated with CD31(+)/CD42(-) microparticles ( r= 0.61; P < 0.001), endothelial progenitors ( r = - 0.45, P < 0.001), and with cholesterol levels ( r = 0.51; P < 0.001). High plasma cholesterol and a high ratio of CD31(+)/CD42(-) microparticles to endothelial progenitors independently predicted an increased aPWV. Microparticles from hypercholesterolemic patients caused a significant endothelial progenitor loss in vitro. Conclusions - Hypercholesterolemia-related aortic stiffness is promoted by plasma cholesterol directly, increased endothelial damage, and reduced endothelium repair capacity by endothelial progenitors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据