4.4 Article

Exenatide elicits sustained glycaemic control and progressive reduction of body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled by sulphonylureas with or without metformin

期刊

DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS
卷 22, 期 6, 页码 483-491

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.646

关键词

exenatide; exendin-4; AC2993; type 2 diabetes; incretin mimetic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background In two placebo-controlled 30-week trials, treatment with exenatide reduced HbA(1c) and body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes in the context of sulphonylurea (SU) or SU plus metformin (MET) as background treatment. This analysis examines the effects of 82 weeks of exenatide treatment for participants in these earlier 30-week trials. Methods Data were pooled from the two pivotal trials of exenatide added to SU or SU plus MET. Both 30-week, placebo-controlled trials of 5 mu g or 10 mu g exenatide b.i.d. were followed by 52-week open-label, uncontrolled extension studies in which all participants received 10 mu g exenatide b.i.d. and continued prior oral therapies. This interim analysis includes data for 222 patients who completed 82 weeks of exenatide treatment (61% M, age 57 +/- 10 y, weight 99 +/- 21 kg, BMI 34 +/- 6 kg/m(2), HbA(1c)8.4 +/- 1.0% [mean +/- SD]). Results Reduction in HbA(1c) from baseline to week 30 (-0.8 +/- 0.1% and -1.0 +/- 0.1% for 5 mu g b.i.d. and 10 mu g b.i.d., respectively [mean +/- SE]) was sustained up to week 82 (-1.0 0.1%). Of 207 patients with baseline HbA(1c) > 7%, 44% achieved HbA(1c) <= 7% at week 82. Reduction of body weight from baseline to week 30 (-1.4 +/- 0.3 kg and -2.1 +/- 0.3 kg for 5 mu g b.i.d. and 10 mu g b.i.d., respectively) was progressive up to week 82 (-4.0 +/- 0.3 kg). The most frequent adverse events were nausea and hypoglycaemia, both generally mild to moderate in intensity. Conclusions Exenatide added to maximally effective doses of SU or SU plus MET resulted in a sustained reduction in HbA(1c) and a progressive reduction in weight over 1(1)/(2) years. Copyright (c) 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据