4.6 Article

Spatial and isoform specific p63 expression in the male human urogenital tract

期刊

JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 176, 期 5, 页码 2268-2273

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2006.07.057

关键词

urogenital system; urinary tract; prostate; gene expression; epithelium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: A homologue of the p53 gene, p63 is considered to be essential for the normal development of stratified epithelium, including epithelium of the urinary tract and prostate. To determine the possible roles of p63 in the male human urogenital tract its expression was systematically examined. Materials and Methods: Expression of p63 protein was evaluated by immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry in normal male human urogenital tract tissues. Differential expression of p63 mRNA isoforms was assessed by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Results: Basal cells in the stratified epithelium of the urinary and reproductive tracts, including the urothelium, prostate, seminal vesicle, ductus deferens and ductus epididymidis, showed intense nuclear immunostaining for p63. In the urinary tract p63 expression disappeared at the epithelium in the mid portion of renal papillae, at which the stratified structure of the epithelium changed to a monolayer structure. In the reproductive tract p63 expression disappeared at the ductuli efferentes. The stratified epithelium of the reproductive tract also changed at this portion. In the testis weak p63 expression was noted in spermatocytes but not in spermatogonia. At the mRNA level Delta Np63 was predominant in the urothelium, prostate, seminal vesicle, ductus deferens, and cauda and corpus epididymis, while TAp63 was predominant in testicular tissues. In addition, distribution of the TAp63 isoform was clearly distinguishable from c-kit expression, which is a biochemical marker of spermatogonia. Conclusions: Differential expression of p63 transcripts seems to characterize the developmental origin and differential biological function in the male human urogenital tract.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据