4.6 Article

Oscillatory beta activity predicts response speed during a multisensory audiovisual reaction time task: A high-density electrical mapping study

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 16, 期 11, 页码 1556-1565

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj091

关键词

cross-modal; EEG; ERP; motor system; sensory integration

资金

  1. NIA NIH HHS [AG22696] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIMH NIH HHS [R01 MH065350, MH65350, R01 MH065350-05] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bisensory redundant targets are processed faster than the respective unisensory target stimuli alone as evidenced by substantially faster reaction times (RTs). This multisensory RT facilitation has been interpreted as an expression of integrative processing between the different sensory modalities. However, the neuronal mechanisms underlying the RT facilitation effect are not well understood. Oscillatory responses in the beta frequency range (13-30 Hz) have been related to sensory-motor processing. Here, we investigated whether modulation of beta responses might also underlie the faster RTs seen for multisensory stimuli. Using high-density electrical mapping, we explored the association between early (50-170 ms) multisensory processing in the evoked beta response and RTs recorded during a simple RT task. Subjects were instructed to indicate the appearance of any stimulus in a stream of auditory-alone (A), visual-alone (V), and multisensory (AV) stimuli by a button press. Beta responses were analyzed using Morlet wavelet transformations. Multisensory interactions were found over frontal, occipital, central, and sensory-motor regions. Critically, beta activity correlated with mean RTs over all stimulus types. Significant negative correlations were found for frontal, occipital, and sensory-motor scalp regions. We conclude that the association between oscillatory beta activity and integrative multisensory processing is directly linked to multisensory RT facilitation effects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据