4.4 Article

Modern human molar enamel thickness and enamel-dentine junction shape

期刊

ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY
卷 51, 期 11, 页码 974-995

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2006.04.012

关键词

average enamel thickness; relative enamel thickness; enamel cap area; dentine area; enamel-dentine junction (EDJ) length; EDJ shape; fossil hominids; hominoids

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines cross-sections of molar crowns in a diverse modern human sample to quantify variation in enamel thickness and enamet-dentine junction (EDJ) shape. Histological sections were generated from molars sectioned buccolinguatty across mesiat cusps. Enamel cap area, dentine area, EDJ length, and bicervical diameter were measured on micrographs using a digitizing tablet. Nine landmarks along the EDJ were defined, and X and Y coordinates were digitized in order to quantify EDJ shape. Upper molars show greater values for the components of enamel thickness, leading to significantly greater average enamel thickness than in tower molars. Average enamel thickness increased significantly from M1 to M3 in both molar rows, due to significantly increasing enamel cap area in upper molars, and decreasing dentine area in lower molars. Differences in EDJ shape were found among maxillary molars in combined and individual populations. Sex differences were also found; mates showed significantly greater dentine area, EDJ length, and bi-cervicat diameters in certain tooth types, which resulted in females having significantly thicker average enamel. Differences in enamel thickness and EDJ shape within molars were also found among populations, although few consistent trends were evident. This study demonstrates that enamel thickness and EDJ shape vary among molars, between sexes, and among populations; these factors must be considered in the categorization and comparison of ape and human molars, particularly when isolated teeth or fossil taxa are included. Human relative enamel thickness encompasses most values reported for fossil apes and humans, suggesting limited taxonomic value when considered alone. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据