4.7 Article

Grain size of loess, palaeosol and Red Clay deposits on the Chinese Loess Plateau: Significance for understanding pedogenic alteration and palaeomonsoon evolution

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2006.06.018

关键词

Chinese Loess Plateau; Loess-palacosol sequence; Red Clay sequence; grain size; pedogenic alteration; palaeomonsoon evolution

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To assess pedogenic modification to grain size distributions of loess, palaeosol and Red Clay deposits on the Chinese Loess Plateau and to understand long-term evolution of the East Asian palaeomonsoon since the late Miocene, we investigate a continuous loess-palaeosol-Red Clay sequence at Lingtai (south Chinese Loess Plateau) and another parallel Red Clay sequence at Zhaojiachuan (central Chinese Loess Plateau). By analyzing the grain size distributions of bulk samples and chemically isolated quartz samples, the relative intensity of pedogenic alteration of the loess, palaeosol and Red Clay deposits can be quantified. Comparisons of the grain size distributions and contents of different grain size fractions between the bulk and the quartz samples suggest that pedogenic alteration is apparently stronger in the Red Clay sequence than in the overlying loess-palaeosol deposits. Furthermore, grain size parameters derived from the bulk and the quartz samples, such as mean grain size, coarse fraction content and U-ratio, exhibit similar variations in the loess-palaeosol sequence (Quaternary, 0-2.6 Ma), whereas these grain size parameters of quartz samples show different variability from those of bulk samples in the Red Clay sequence (late Miocene to Pliocene, 2.67 Ma). Grain size of quartz from the loess-palaeosol and Red Clay deposits exhibits distinct and persistent oscillations from the late Miocene to the Pleistocene, implying that significant fluctuations of the palaeomonsoon climate in East Asia might have occurred at least since late Miocene time. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据