4.4 Article

Structural basis for the nuclear protein import cycle

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL SOCIETY TRANSACTIONS
卷 34, 期 -, 页码 701-704

出版社

PORTLAND PRESS LTD
DOI: 10.1042/BST0340701

关键词

GTPase; importin; nuclear pore complex; nuclear protein import cycle; nuclear transport; Ran

资金

  1. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178939] Funding Source: Medline
  2. MRC [MC_U105178939] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U105178939] Funding Source: researchfish

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Transport of macromolecules between the nuclear and cytoplasmic compartments through NPCs (nuclear pore complexes) is mediated by soluble transport factors that are commonly members of the importin-beta superfamily. in the nuclear protein import cycle, importin-p binds cargo in the cytoplasm (usually via the importin-alpha adaptor) and transports it through NPCs with which it interacts transiently by way of NPC proteins ('nucleoporins') that contain distinctive FG (Phe-Gly) sequence repeats. in the nucleus, Ran-GTP binds to importin-beta, dissociating the import complex. The importin-beta-Ran-GTP complex recycles to the cytoplasm, whereas importin-alpha is recycled by the importin-beta family member CAS (cellular apoptosis susceptibility protein) complexed with Ran-GTP. Cytoplasmic RanGAP (Ran GTPase-activating protein) dissociates these complexes, freeing the importins for another import cycle. Crystallography and biochemical and cellular studies have enabled a molecular description of the transport cycle to be developed and tested using protein engineering and computer modelling. Importin-beta family members are elongated flexible molecules that adapt their shape to encircle their cargoes. Ran-GTP binds at three sites along importin-beta and CAS, locking the molecules into a rigid conformation that is unable to bind cargoes effectively. interactions between transport factors and key nucleoporins (such as Nup1p, Nup2p and Nup50) accelerate the formation and dissolution of many of these complexes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据