4.5 Review

Glucose metabolism and proliferation in glia: role of astrocytic gap junctions

期刊

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
卷 99, 期 4, 页码 1049-1061

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2006.04088.x

关键词

connexin 43; glial cells; glioma; glucose

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Astrocytes play a well-established role in brain metabolism, being a key element in the capture of energetic compounds from the circulation and in their delivery to active neurons. Their metabolic status is affected in many pathological situations, such as gliomas, which are the most common brain tumors. This proliferative dysfunction is associated with changes in gap junctional communication, a property strongly developed in normal astrocytes studied both in vitro and in vivo. Here, we summarize and discuss the findings that have lead to the identification of a link between gap junctions, glucose uptake, and proliferation. Indeed, the inhibition of gap junctional communication is associated with an increase in glucose uptake due to a rapid change in the localization of both GLUT-1 and type I hexokinase. This effect persists due to the up-regulation of GLUT-1 and type I hexokinase and to the induction of GLUT-3 and type II hexokinase. In addition, cyclins D1 and D3 have been found to act as sensors of the inhibition of gap junctions and have been proposed to play the role of mediators in the mitogenic effect observed. Conversely, in C6 glioma cells, characterized by a low level of intercellular communication, an increase in gap junctional communication reduces glucose uptake by releasing type I and type II hexokinases from the mitochondria and decreases the exacerbated rate of proliferation due to the up-regulation of the Cdk inhibitors p21 and p27. Identification of the molecular actors involved in these pathways should allow the determination of potential therapeutic targets that could lead to the testing of alternative strategies to prevent, or at least slow down, the proliferation of glioma cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据