4.6 Article

Differentiation of chronic sinus diseases by measurement of inflammatory mediators

期刊

ALLERGY
卷 61, 期 11, 页码 1280-1289

出版社

BLACKWELL PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1111/j.1398-9995.2006.01225.x

关键词

chronic rhinosinusitis; cystic fibrosis; cytokine profile; inflammation; nasal polyps; remodeling; Th1/Th2 polarization

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) clinically is a heterogeneous group of sinus diseases, which may cover different disease entities, or may represent a disease continuum. Studying inflammatory cells and mediators in clearly defined disease subgroups may lead to a better differentiation of chronic sinus diseases. Methods: Sinonasal mucosal tissue from 10 nasal polyp (NP) patients, 13 cystic fibrosis patients (CF-NP), eight CRS subjects without polyps, and nine control patients were stained for CD3, CD25, CD68, CD20, myeloperoxidase (MPO), CD138 and tissue homogenates were assayed for eotaxin, interleukin (IL)-1 beta, IL-2sR alpha, IL-5, interferon (IFN)-gamma, IL-8, transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta 1, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and MPO by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or UNICAP system. Results: Nasal polyp and CF-NP showed increased numbers and activation of T cells, while only NP displayed an increase in plasma cells. Nasal polyp had significantly higher levels of eosinophilic markers [eosinophils, eotaxin, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP)] compared with CRS, controls and CF-NP. Chronic rhinosinusitis was characterized by a Th1 polarization with high levels of IFN-gamma and TGF-beta, while NP showed a Th2 polarization with high IL-5 and immunoglobulin (Ig) E concentrations. Nasal polyp and CF-NP were discriminated by edema from CRS and controls, with CF-NP displaying a very prominent neutrophilic inflammation. Conclusions: Based on cellular and mediator profiles, we suggest that CRS, NP, and CF-NP are distinct disease entities within the group of chronic sinus diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据