4.5 Article

Differentiation between populations of a termite in eastern Africa: implications for biogeography

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY
卷 33, 期 11, 页码 1993-2000

出版社

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2006.01556.x

关键词

AFLP; arid corridor; biogeography; coastal forests; Guineo-Congolian forests; Isoptera; Kenya; morphometry; Schedorhinotermes lamanianus

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Aim African forests are divided by an arid corridor which runs from the Horn of Africa to the Namib Desert. Several forest species occur in the forests of eastern Africa as well as in the Guineo-Congolian forest block. We evaluate the possibility that such species may have crossed the arid corridor along a route through the Kenyan Highlands and down the eastern drainages during climatologically favourable periods in the past. Locations Eastern Africa, Ivory Coast. Methods We used the termite species Schedorhinotermes lamanianus (Sjostedt). This species occurs in lowland forests and woodland throughout Africa south of the Sahara. We sampled termites from 12 populations. We evaluated the differentiation between populations using amplified fragment length polymorphisms as well as morphometrical measurements. Results Genetic and morphometrical analysis demonstrated substantial differentiation between populations west and east of the arid corridor in Kenya. To the east of this corridor we found an increase of morphological distance with geographical distance. Schedorhinotermes lamanianus occurs not only along the coast but also at isolated locations (e.g. ground-water forests in foothills) within the arid hinterland. Main conclusions We interpret these populations as remnants of a wider distribution during wet climatic periods. At these times, populations of S. lamanianus were apparently able to establish along extensive gallery forests protruding into the arid belt of the Kenyan hinterland. There have been no connections between populations of this species east and west of the arid corridor across the Kenyan Highlands.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据