4.7 Article

Reactive oxygen metabolism in mycorrhizal and non-mycorrhizal citrus (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings subjected to water stress

期刊

JOURNAL OF PLANT PHYSIOLOGY
卷 163, 期 11, 页码 1101-1110

出版社

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.jplph.2005.09.001

关键词

antioxidant; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; citrus; oxidative damage; water stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The effect of the arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungus, Glomus versiforme, on growth and reactive oxygen metabolism of trifoliate orange (Poncirus trifoliata) seedlings was studied in potted plants under well-watered (WW) and water stressed (WS) conditions. Water stress significantly decreased root colonization. Shoot dry weight, plant height and stem diameter were higher in AM than in non-AM seedlings regardless of the water status. Inoculation with G. versiforme increased root dry weight and Leaf number per plant of WW seedlings. There was less malondiatdehyde (MDA) concentration in leaves and roots of AM seedlings, as well as tower hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and superoxide anion radical (O-2(.-)) concentrations in AM roots under WW and WS conditions. AM inoculation did not affect the H2O2 and O-2(.-) concentrations of WW leaves. Whether WS or not, AM symbiosis notably increased the guaiacol peroxidase (G-POD) activity of Leaves, glutathione reductase (GR) activity of leaves and ascorbate peroxidase (APX) activity of roots. AM infection also markedly increased the APX activity of WS leaves. Soluble proteins and glutathione (GSH) in leaves and roots and ascorbate (ASC) in leaves were higher in WW AM than in WW non-AM seedlings. AM infection also enhanced the ASC. and GSH contents of leaves and roots in WS seedlings. Cross-toterance might occur in AM plants and be enhanced by AM symbiosis. Our results suggest that the increased concentrations of antioxidant enzymes and non-enzymatic antioxidants found in AM plants may serve to protect the organism against oxidative damage, enhancing drought tolerance. (c) 2005 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据