4.5 Article

In vitro modeling of the HIV-macrophage reservoir

期刊

JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
卷 80, 期 5, 页码 1127-1135

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1189/jlb.0206126

关键词

GFP; latency; laser capture; flow cytometry

资金

  1. NIAID NIH HHS [1P30 AI42855, R01 AI057007] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [1 K08 DA16160, K08 DA016160, K08 DA016160-03] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Macrophages are recognized as a putative reservoir for HIV-1, hut whether HIV can establish latent infection in this cell type is not known. An in vitro model using long-term cultured primary human monocyte-derived macrophages (MDM) infected with an M-tropic, enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) tagged reporter virus was developed to test the hypothesis that HIV can establish a latent infection of this cell type. The EGFP-IRES-Nef cassette allowed detection of early gene transcription. The expression of GFP+ MDM was followed with time and the GFP- population was purified and analyzed for evidence of latent infection. Interestingly, in MDM cultures propagated for over two months, distinct subpopulations of infected GFP+ cells were observed and quantitated. In particular, infected MDM that displayed a high level of transcription, characterized as the GFP hi group, yet produced low levels of the late viral gene product, p24, increased with time and represented 10% of the GFP+ population in longterm cultures. The high level production of early genes such as Nef, a protein that can facilitate viral immune escape, but low level of structural proteins such as p24 in the GFP hi population suggests that a subset of infected MDM can exhibit an alternative mode of replication. The GFP- MDM population obtained by a two-step purification protocol using flow cytometry and laser ablation contained integrated provirus as assessed by Alu-LTR real-time PCR analyses. A subset of these, were replication competent as shown by their ability to express GFP and/or p24 antigen after reactivation with IL-4. J. Leukoc. Biol. 80: 1127-1135; 2006.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据