4.8 Article

XIAP deficiency in humans causes an X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome

期刊

NATURE
卷 444, 期 7115, 页码 110-114

出版社

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/nature05257

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The homeostasis of the immune response requires tight regulation of the proliferation and apoptosis of activated lymphocytes(1,2). In humans, defects in immune homeostasis result in lymphoproliferation disorders including autoimmunity, haemophagocytic lymphohystiocytosis and lymphomas. The X-linked lymphoproliferative syndrome (XLP) is a rare, inherited immunodeficiency that is characterized by lymphohystiocytosis, hypogammaglobulinaemia and lymphomas, and that usually develops in response to infection with Epstein - Barr virus (EBV)(3-5). Mutations in the signalling lymphocyte activation molecule ( SLAM)- associated protein SAP, a signalling adaptor molecule, underlie 60% of cases of familial XLP6-8. Here, we identify mutations in the gene that encodes the X-linked inhibitor-of-apoptosis XIAP ( also termed BIRC4) in patients with XLP from three families without mutations in SAP. These mutations lead to defective expression of XIAP. We show that apoptosis of lymphocytes from XIAP-deficient patients is enhanced in response to various stimuli including the T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) - CD3 complex, the death receptor CD95 ( also termed Fas or Apo-1) and the TNF-associated apoptosis-inducing ligand receptor (TRAIL-R). We also found that XIAP-deficient patients, like SAP-deficient patients, have low numbers of natural killer T-lymphocytes (NKT cells)(9,10), indicating that XIAP is required for the survival and/or differentiation of NKT cells. The observation that XIAP-deficiency and SAP-deficiency are both associated with a defect in NKT cells strengthens the hypothesis that NKT cells have a key role in the immune response to EBV. Furthermore, by identifying an XLP immunodeficiency that is caused by mutations in XIAP, we show that XIAP is a potent regulator of lymphocyte homeostasis in vivo.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据