4.6 Article

Targeted glycoproteomics:: Serial lectin affinity chromatography in the selection of O-glycosylation sites on proteins from the human blood proteome

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
卷 1132, 期 1-2, 页码 165-173

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.07.070

关键词

proteomics; serial lectin affinity chromatography; O-glycosylation; mass spectrometry

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [GM59996] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Although lectin selection is gaining increasing acceptance as a tool for targeting glycosylation in glycoproteornics, most of the work has been directed at N-glycosylation. The work reported here focuses on the use of lectins in the study of O-glycosylation. The problem with using lectins for studying O-glycosylation is that they are not sufficiently specific. This paper reports that through the use of serial lectin affinity chromatography (SLAC) it is possible to select predominantly O-glycosylated peptides from tryptic digests of human serum. Jacalin is relatively specific for O-glycosylation but has the problem that it also selects high mannose N-type glycans. This problem was addressed by using a concanavalin A affinity column to first remove high mannose, hybrid-type and biantennary complex-type N-type glycans before application of the Jacalin columns. When used in a serial format, concanavalin A and Jacalin together provide essentially O-glycosylated peptides. The glycoprotein parents of glycopeptides were identified by deglycosylating the selected O-glycopeptides by oxidative elimination. These peptides were then separated by RPC and further analyzed using ESI-MS/MS and MALDI-MS/MS. Using this approach all the O-glycosylated sites in a model protein (fetuin) and over thirty glycoprotein parents from human serum were identified. It is concluded that a serial combination of Con A and Jacalin can be of utility in the study of O-glycosylation in glycoproteornics. (c) 2006 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据