4.8 Article

Nonspecific binding to structured RNA and preferential unwinding of an exposed helix by the CYT-19 protein, a DEAD-box RNA chaperone

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0603127103

关键词

group; RNA; RNA folding; RNA unwinding; Tetrahymena ribozyme

资金

  1. NIGMS NIH HHS [R01 GM 070456, R01 GM070456] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We explore the interactions of CYT-19, a DExD/H-box protein that functions in folding of group I RNAs, with a well characterized misfolded species of the Tetrahymena ribozyme. Consistent with its function, CYT-19 accelerates refolding of the misfolded RNA to its native state. Unexpectedly, CYT-19 performs another reaction much more efficiently; it unwinds the 6-bp P1 duplex formed between the ribozyme and its oligonucleotide substrate. Furthermore, CYT-19 performs this reaction 50-fold more efficiently than it unwinds the same duplex free in solution, suggesting that it forms additional interactions with the ribozyme, most likely using a distinct RNA binding site from the one responsible for unwinding. This site can apparently bind double-stranded RNA, as attachment of a simple duplex adjacent to P1 recapitulates much of the activation provided by the ribozyme. Unwinding, the native P1 duplex does not accelerate refolding of the misfolded ribozyme, implying that CYT-19 can disrupt multiple contacts on the RNA, consistent with its function in folding of multiple RNAs. Further experiments showed that the PI duplex unwinding activity is virtually the same whether the ribozyme is misfolded or native but is abrogated by formation of tertiary contacts between the P1 duplex and the body of the ribozyme. Together these results suggest a mechanism for CYT-19 and other general DExD/H-box RNA chaperones in which the proteins bind to structured RNAs and efficiently unwind loosely associated duplexes, which biases the proteins to disrupt normative base pairs and gives the liberated strands an opportunity to refold.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据