4.7 Article

Analyzing solution-phase time-resolved x-ray diffraction data by isolated-solute models

期刊

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
卷 125, 期 17, 页码 -

出版社

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.2386158

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracting transient structural information of a solute from time-resolved x-ray diffraction (TRXD) data is not trivial because the signal from a solution contains not only the solute-only term as in the gas phase, but also solvent-related terms. To obtain structural insights, the diffraction signal in q space is often Fourier sine transformed (FT) into r space, and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation-aided signal decomposition into the solute, cage, and solvent terms has so far been indispensable for a clear-cut assignment of structural features. Here we present a convenient method of comparative structural analysis without involving MD simulations by incorporating only isolated-species models for the solute. FT is applied to both the experimental data and candidate isolated-solute models, and comparison of the correlation factors between the experimental FT and the model FTs can distinguish the best candidate among isolated-solute models for the reaction intermediates. The low q region whose influence by solvent-related terms is relatively high can be further excluded, and this mode of truncated Fourier transform (TFT) improves the correlation factors and facilitates the comparison. TFT analysis has been applied to TRXD data on the photodissociation of C2H4I2 in two different solvents (methanol and cyclohexane), HgI2 in methanol, and I-3(-) in methanol excited at 267 nm. The results are consistent with previous conclusions for C2H4I2 in methanol and HgI2 in methanol, and the new TRXD data reveal that the C2H4I transient radical has a bridged structure in cyclohexane and I-3(-) in methanol decomposes into I+I-2(-) upon irradiation at 267 nm. This TFT method should greatly simplify the analysis because it bypasses MD simulations. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据