4.7 Article

Light curves from an MHD simulation of a black hole accretion disk

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 651, 期 2, 页码 1031-1048

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/507421

关键词

accretion, accretion disks; black hole physics; X-rays : binaries

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We use a relativistic ray-tracing code to calculate the light curves observed from a global, general relativistic, magnetohydrodynamic simulation of an accretion flow onto a Schwarzschild black hole. We apply three basic emission models to sample different properties of the time-dependent accretion disk. With one of these models, which assumes thermal blackbody emission and free-free absorption, we can predict qualitative features of the high-frequency power spectrum from stellar-mass black holes in the ''thermal dominant'' state. The simulated power spectrum is characterized by a power law of index Gamma approximate to 3 and total rms fractional variance of less than or similar to 2% above 10 Hz. For each emission model, we find that the variability amplitude should increase with increasing inclination angle. On the basis of a newly developed formalism for quantifying the significance of quasi-periodic oscillations (QPOs) in simulation data, we find that these simulations are able to identify any such features with (rms/mean) amplitudes greater than or similar to 1% near the orbital frequency at the innermost stable orbit. Initial results indicate the existence of transient QPO peaks with frequency ratios of nearly 2: 3 at a 99.9% confidence limit, but they are not generic features, because at any given time they are seen only from certain observer directions. In addition, we present detailed analysis of the azimuthal structure of the accretion disk and the evolution of density perturbations in the inner disk. These ''hot-spot'' structures appear to be roughly self-similar over a range of disk radii, with a single characteristic size delta phi = 25 degrees and delta r/r = 0.3, and typical lifetimes T-l approximate to 3T(orb).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据