4.6 Article

Novel insights into capillary vessel basement membrane damage by snake venom hemorrhagic metalloproteinases:: A biochemical and immunohistochemical study

期刊

ARCHIVES OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS
卷 455, 期 2, 页码 144-153

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.abb.2006.09.018

关键词

snake venom; metalloproteinase; basement membrane; endothelial cells; hemorrhage; extracellular matrix

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The hemorrhagic activity characteristic of viperid snake envenomations is due to the action of venom metalloproteinases (SVMPs) the capillary vessel basement membrane (BM). This study compared the action of two SVMPs on BM in vitro (degradation of Matrigel) and in vivo (immunohistochemical assessment of BM markers in mouse gastrocnemius muscle). SVMPs BaP1 (belonging to the P-I class) and jararhagin (of the P-III class) had a similar proteolytic activity on azocasein and degraded Matrigel with a slightly different cleavage pattern, since BaP1 exerted a limited proteolysis of both laminin and nidogen, whereas jararhagin predominantly degraded nidogen. In contrast with this pattern of limited proteolysis of BM proteins observed in vitro, immunohistochemical analysis of laminin, nidogen and type IV collagen, as well as of the endothelial cell marker VEGFR-2, in the hemorrhagic areas in the muscle, revealed a pronounced reduction in the immunostaining of these three BM components, associated with a loss of the endothelial cell marker. BM of muscle fibers was affected to a lesser extent. In conclusion, in vitro results demonstrated that SVMPs induce a pattern of limited proteolysis on BM components. The drastic loss of these antigens in affected capillaries in vivo is likely to depend on the combination of limited proteolysis BM and the action of hemodynamic biophysical forces, previously shown to play a role in SVMP-induced capillary damage, which may cause a mechanical disruption of BM structure. (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据