4.7 Article

Optical sensor for sulfur dioxide determination in wines

期刊

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
卷 54, 期 23, 页码 8697-8701

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/jf061553h

关键词

optical sensor; gas sensor; sulfur dioxide; sulfite; wine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A method for the determination of free and total sulfur dioxide in wines, based on the use of an optical sensor that employs a dichlorobis( diphenylphosphino) methane dipalladium I complex [Pd-2(dppm)(2)Cl-2] immobilized in a PVC membrane plasticized with o-nitrophenyloctylether (o-NPOE) is described. A sensing membrane [4.2% Pd-2(dppm)(2)Cl-2, 20.8% PVC, and 75% o-NPOE] was adapted to the tip of a bifurcated optical fiber bundle to perform reflectance measurements at 550 nm. The detection system consisted of two cells (40 mL), which hold the sample solution (plus reagents) and the optical sensor, respectively. For the determination of free SO2, a wine sample was mixed with H2SO4 solution in the sample cell, into which N-2 was bubbled, providing mixing of the solutions and conducting the SO2 formed toward the detection cell. For determination of total SO2, a KOH solution was mixed with the wine in the sample cell. Afterward, an H2SO4 solution was added to the cell, and then N-2 was bubbled to conclude the measurement. Linear responses up to 50 and 150 mg L-1 were obtained for free and total SO2, with detection limits of 0.37 and 0.70 mg L-1, respectively. The repeatability of the method was evaluated by carrying out 10 measurements using a single wine sample, providing relative standard deviation values of 2.2 and 2.5% for free and total SO2, respectively. The sensing membrane prepared from 10 mu L of the cocktail solution lasted for 80 measurements, whereas those prepared from 200 mu L can be used for 250 measurements. The method was applied to free and total SO2 determination in wines, and the results did not show significant difference from those obtained with the Ripper reference method at a confidence level of 95%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据