4.7 Article

An assessment of shuttle radar topography mission digital elevation data for studies of volcano morphology

期刊

REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT
卷 105, 期 1, 页码 41-53

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2006.06.002

关键词

SRTM; volcanology; geomorphometry; dissection index

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Shuttle Radar Topography Mission has provided high spatial resolution digital topographic data for most of Earth's volcanoes. Although these data were acquired with a nominal spatial resolution of 30 in, such data are only available for volcanoes located within the U.S.A. and its Territories. For the overwhelming majority of Earth's volcanoes not contained within this subset, DEMs are available in the form of a re-sampled 90 m product. This has prompted us to perform an assessment of the extent to which volcano-morphologic information present in the raw 30 in SRTM product is retained in the degraded 90 m product. To this end, we have (a) applied a simple metric, the so called dissection index (di), to summarize the shapes of volcanic edifices as encoded in a DEM and (b) using this metric, evaluated the extent to which this topographic information is lost as the spatial resolution of the data is reduced. Calculating di as a function of elevation (a di profile) allows us to quantitatively summarize the morphology of a volcano. Our results indicate that although the re-sampling of the 30 m SRTM data obviously results in a loss of morphological information, this loss is not catastrophic. Analysis of a group of six Alaskan volcanoes indicates that differences in di profiles calculated from the 30 m SRTM product are largely preserved in the 90 m product. This analysis of resolution effects on the preservation of topographic information has implications for research that relies on understanding volcanoes through the analysis of topographic datasets of similar spatial resolutions produced by other remote sensing techniques (e.g., repeat-pass interferometric SAR; optical stereometry). (c) 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据