4.7 Article

New polymorphs of 9-nitro-camptothecin prepared using a supercritical anti-solvent process

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 496, 期 2, 页码 551-560

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2015.10.079

关键词

9-Nitro-camptothecin; Polymorph; Micronization; Supercritical anti-solvent process solvent; Physicochemical properties; Cytotoxicity

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21276091, 21476086]
  2. Ph.D. Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [20120172110010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recrystallization and micronization of 9-nitro-camptothecin (9-NC) has been investigated using the supercritical anti-solvent (SAS) technology in this study. Five operating factors, i.e., the type of organic solvent, the concentration of 9-NC in the solution, the flow rate of 9-NC solution, the precipitation pressure and the temperature, were optimized using a selected OA16 (45) orthogonal array design and a series of characterizations were performed for all samples. The results showed that the processed 9-NC particles exhibited smaller particle size and narrower particle size distribution as compared with 9-NC raw material (Form I), and the optimum micronization conditions for preparing 9-NC with minimum particle size were determined by variance analysis, where the solvent plays the most important role in the formation and transformation of polymorphs. Three new polymorphic forms (Form II, III and IV) of 9-NC, which present different physicochemical properties, were generated after the SAS process. The predicted structures of the 9-NC crystals, which were consistent with the experiments, were performed from their experimental XRD data by the direct space approach using the Reflex module of Materials Studio. Meanwhile, the optimal sample (Form III) was proved to have higher cytotoxicity against the cancer cells, which suggested the therapeutic efficacy of 9-NC is polymorph-dependent. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据