4.7 Article

The feedback-regulated growth of black holes and bulges through gas accretion and starbursts in cluster central dominant galaxies

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 652, 期 1, 页码 216-231

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1086/507672

关键词

cooling flows; galaxies : active; galaxies : clusters : general; X-rays : galaxies; X-rays : galaxies : clusters

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present an analysis of the growth of black holes through accretion and bulges through star formation in 33 galaxies at the centers of cooling flows. Most of these systems show evidence of cavities in the intracluster medium (ICM) inflated by radio jets emanating from their active galactic nuclei (AGNs). We present a new and extensive analysis of X-ray cavities in these systems. We find that AGNs are energetically able to balance radiative losses ( cooling) from the ICM in more than half of our sample. We examine the relationship between cooling and star formation and find that the star formation rates are approaching or are comparable to X-ray and far-UV limits on the rates of gas condensation onto the central galaxy. The vast gulf between radiative losses and the sink of cooling material, which has been the primary objection to cooling flows, has narrowed significantly. Using the cavity (jet) powers, we place strong lower limits on the rate of growth of the central black holes, and we find that they are growing at an average rate of similar to 0.1 M-circle dot yr(-1), with some systems growing as quickly as similar to 1 M-circle dot yr(-1). We find a trend between bulge growth (star formation) and black hole growth that is approximately in accordance with the slope of the local (Magorrian) relation between black hole and bulge mass, but the scatter suggests that bulges and black holes do not necessarily grow in lockstep. Bondi accretion can power the low-luminosity sources, provided the nuclear gas density rises as similar to r(-1) to the Bondi radius, but is probably too feeble to fuel the most powerful outbursts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据