4.7 Review

Pharmacogenomics: Challenges and opportunities

期刊

ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
卷 145, 期 10, 页码 749-757

出版社

AMER COLL PHYSICIANS
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-145-10-200611210-00007

关键词

-

资金

  1. NHLBI NIH HHS [U01 HL65899, U01 HL69757, U19 HL069757, U01 HL065962, U01 HL065899, U19 HL065962, U01 HL65962, U01 HL069757] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIDA NIH HHS [U01 DA020830, U01 DA20830] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIGMS NIH HHS [U01 GM074492, U01 GM061373, U01 GM74492, U01 GM61373, U19 GM061388, U01 GM061374, U01 GM061390, U01 GM61393, U01 GM63340, U01 GM61390, U01 GM61374, U19 GM061390, U01 GM74518, U01 GM061393, U01 GM074518, U01 GM061388, U01 GM61388, U01 GM063340] Funding Source: Medline
  4. Wellcome Trust Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The outcome of drug therapy is often unpredictable, ranging from beneficial effects to lack of efficacy to serious adverse effects. Variations in single genes are 1 well-recognized cause of such unpredictability, defining the field of pharmacogenetics (see Glossary). Such variations may involve genes controlling drug metabolism, drug transport, disease susceptibility, or drug targets. The sequencing of the human genome and the cataloguing of variants across human genomes are the enabling resources for the nascent field of phafmacogenomics (see Glossary), which tests the idea that genomic variability underlies variability in drug responses. However, there are many challenges that must be overcome to apply rapidly accumulating genomic information to understand variable drug responses, including defining candidate genes and pathways; relating disease genes to drug response genes; precisely defining drug response phenotypes; and addressing analytic, ethical, and technological issues involved in generation and management of large drug response data sets. Overcoming these challenges holds the promise of improving new drug development and ultimately individualizing the selection of appropriate drugs and dosages for individual patients.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据