4.5 Article

Decreased expression of the GABAA receptor in fragile X syndrome

期刊

BRAIN RESEARCH
卷 1121, 期 -, 页码 238-245

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.08.115

关键词

fragile X syndrome; fragile X knockout mouse; fragile X fly model; real-time PCR; GABA(A) receptor

向作者/读者索取更多资源

After our initial discovery of under expression of the GABA(A) receptor 8 subunit in a genome wide screening for differentially expressed mRNAs in brain of fragile X mice, a validated model for fragile X mental retardation syndrome, we analyzed expression of the 17 remaining subunits of the GABA(A) receptor using real-time PCR. We confirmed nearly 50% under expression of the 6 subunit and found a significant 35%-50% reduction in expression of 7 additional subunit mRNAs, namely alpha(1) alpha(3), and alpha(4), beta(1) and beta(2) and gamma(1) and gamma(2), in fragile X mice compared to wild-type littermates. In concordance with previous results, under expression was found in cortex, but not in cerebellum. Moreover, decreased expression of specific GABA(A) receptor subunits in fragile X syndrome seems to be an evolutionary conserved hallmark since in the fragile X fly (Drosophila melanoyaster) model we also found almost 50% under expression of all 3 subunits which make up the invertebrate GAB(A) receptor, namely Grd, Rdl and Lcch3. In addition, we demonstrated a direct correlation between the amount of dFmrp and the expression of the GAB(A) receptor subunits Rdl and Grd. Our results add evidence to previous observations of an altered GABAergic system in fragile X syndrome. Because GABA(A) receptors are the major inhibitory receptors in brain, involved in anxiety, depression, insomnia, learning and memory and epilepsy, processes also disturbed in fragile X patients, the well described GABA(A) receptor pharmacology might open new powerful opportunities for treatment of the behavioral and epileptic phenotype associated with fragile X syndrome. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据