4.6 Article

βPak-interacting exchange factor-mediated Rac1 activation requires smgGDS guanine nucleotide exchange factor in basic fibroblast growth factor-induced neurite outgrowth

期刊

JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY
卷 281, 期 47, 页码 35954-35964

出版社

AMER SOC BIOCHEMISTRY MOLECULAR BIOLOGY INC
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M602399200

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Neuritogenesis requires active actin cytoskeleton rearrangement in which Rho GTPases play a pivotal role. In a previous study ( Shin, E. Y., Woo, K. N., Lee, C. S., Koo, S. H., Kim, Y. G., Kim, W. J., Bae, C. D., Chang, S. I., and Kim, E. G. ( 2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 1994-2004), we demonstrated that beta Pak-interacting exchange factor (beta PIX) guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) mediates basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF)-stimulated Rac1 activation through phosphorylation of Ser-525 and Thr-526 at the GIT-binding domain (GBD). However, the mechanism by which this phosphorylation event regulates the Rac1-GEF activity remained elusive. We show here that beta PIX binds to Rac1 via the GBD and also activates the GTPase via an associated GEF, smgGDS, in a phosphorylation-dependent manner. Notably, the Rac1-GEF activity of beta PIX persisted for an extended period of time following bFGF stimulation, unlike other Rho GEFs containing the Dbl homology domain. We demonstrate that C-PIX, containing proline-rich, GBD, and leucine zipper domains can interact with Rac1 via the GBD in vitro and in vivo and also mediated bFGF-stimulated Rac1 activation, as determined by a modified GEF assay and fluorescence resonance energy transfer analysis. However, nonphosphorylatable C-PIX ( S525A/T526A)failed to generate Rac1-GTP. Finally, beta PIX is shown to form a trimeric complex with smgGDS and Rac1; down-regulation of smgGDS expression by short interfering RNA causing significant inhibition of beta PIX-mediated Rac1 activation and neurite outgrowth. These results provide evidence for a new and unexpected mechanism whereby beta PIX can regulate Rac1 activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据