4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Fabricating highly active mixed phase TiO2 photocatalysts by reactive DC magnetron sputter deposition

期刊

THIN SOLID FILMS
卷 515, 期 3, 页码 1176-1181

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.07.094

关键词

magnetron sputtering; anatase; rutile; titanium oxide

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent work points out the importance of the solid-solid interface in explaining the high photoactivity of mixed phase TiO2 catalysts. The goal of this research is to probe the structural and functional relationships of the solid-solid interface created by the reactive DC magnetron sputtering of titanium dioxide. We show that sputter deposition provides excellent control of the phase and interface formation. We explored the effects of the process parameters of pressure, oxygen partial pressure, target power, substrate bias (RF), deposition incidence angle, and post annealing treatment on the structural and functional characteristics of the catalysts. We have successfully made pure and mixed phase TiO2 films. These films were characterized with AFM, SEM, TEM, and XRD to determine surface morphology, phase distribution and phase content. The performance as photocatalytic surfaces was measured and compared (normalized for surface area) to mixed phase TiO2 fabricated by other methods, including flame hydrolysis powders, and sol-gel deposited TiO2 films. The sputtered mixed phase materials were far superior to the commercial standard (Degussa P25) and sol-gel TiO2 as measured by the gas phase oxidation of the air pollutant acetaldehyde under UV illumination. These results demonstrate that reactive DC magnetron sputtering is a powerful tool for investigating the role of the solid-solid interface in influencing photocatalytic activity. In addition, our work illustrates the feasibility of reactive DC magnetron sputtering as a practical commercial technique for manufacturing highly active nanostructured TiO2 photocatalysts. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据