4.7 Article

Suppression of IL-1β expression by the Jak 2 inhibitor AG490 in cerulein-stimulated pancreatic acinar cells

期刊

BIOCHEMICAL PHARMACOLOGY
卷 72, 期 11, 页码 1555-1562

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2006.07.008

关键词

cerulein; IL-1 beta; Jak/Stat; AG490; pancreatic acinar cells

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cerulein pancreatitis is similar to human edematous pancreatitis with dysregulation of the digestive enzyme production and cytoplasmic vacuolization, the death of acinar cells, edema formation, and an infiltration of inflammatory cells into the pancreas. Cytokines are up-regulated in pancreatic acinar cells stimulated with cerulein. In various cells and tissues, Janus kinase (Jak)/signal transducer and activator of transcription (Stat) pathway mediates inflammatory process. In the present study, we investigated whether the activation of Jak/Stat signaling mediates IL-1 beta expression in pancreatic acinar AR42J cells stimulated with cerulein in vitro as well as the rats with cerulein pancreatitis in vivo using AG490, the Jak2 inhibitor. Activation of Jak2 and Stat3 were monitored by Western blot analysis for phosphorylated Jak2 and phosphorylated Stat3. mRNA expression and protein level of IL-1 beta were determined by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA). Histological examination of pancreatic tissues were performed and serum IL-1 beta levels of the rats were determined by ELISA. As a result, cerulein induced the activation of Jak2 and Stat3 as well as IL-1 beta expression, which was inhibited by the treatment of AG490 in AR42J cells. In cerulein pancreatitis of the rats, edematous and inflammatory changes of the pancreas and increased serum levels of IL-1 beta were suppressed by AG490 treatment. In conclusion, Jak2/Stat3 pathway may be the underlying mechanism in the pathogenesis of pancreatitis by inducing cytokines such as IL-1 beta. 2006 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据