4.3 Article

Preventing youth violence and delinquency through a universal school-based prevention approach

期刊

PREVENTION SCIENCE
卷 7, 期 4, 页码 403-408

出版社

SPRINGER/PLENUM PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1007/s11121-006-0057-y

关键词

adolescence; violence; aggression; prevention; substance use

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R03 CA096467-02, R03 CA096467] Funding Source: Medline
  2. NIAAA NIH HHS [R03 AA012945-02] Funding Source: Medline
  3. NIDA NIH HHS [R03 DA014964-02, DA08905] Funding Source: Medline
  4. NIMHD NIH HHS [L60 MD000656-03, L60 MD000656, L60 MD000656-04] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Violence is an important public health problem among adolescents in the United States. Substance use and violence tend to co-occur among adolescents and appear to have similar etiologies. The present study examined the extent to which a comprehensive prevention approach targeting an array of individual-level risk and protective factors and previously found effective in preventing tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use is capable of decreasing violence and delinquency. Schools (N=41) were randomly assigned to intervention and control conditions. Participants in the 20 intervention schools received the Life Skills Training prevention program including material focusing on violence and the media, anger management, and conflict resolution skills. Survey data were collected from 4,858 sixth grade students prior to the intervention and three months later after the intervention. Findings showed significant reductions in violence and delinquency for intervention participants relative to controls. Stronger prevention effects were found for students who received at least half of the preventive intervention. These effects include less verbal and physical aggression, fighting, and delinquency. The results of this study indicate that a school-based prevention approach previously found to prevent tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use can also prevent violence and delinquency.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据