4.7 Article

Characterization of transport mechanisms and determinants critical for Na+-dependent Pi symport of the PiT family paralogs human PiT1 and PiT2

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-CELL PHYSIOLOGY
卷 291, 期 6, 页码 C1377-C1387

出版社

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.00015.2006

关键词

inorganic phosphate transport; retroviral receptor; SLC20

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The general phosphate need in mammalian cells is accommodated by members of the Pi transport (PiT) family (SLC20), which use either Na+ or H+ to mediate inorganic phosphate (P-i) symport. The mammalian PiT para-logs PiT1 and PiT2 are Na+-dependent Pi ( NaPi) transporters and are exploited by a group of retroviruses for cell entry. Human PiT1 and PiT2 were characterized by expression in Xenopus laevis oocytes with P-32(i) as a traceable Pi source. For PiT1, the Michaelis-Menten constant for Pi was determined as 322.5 +/- 124.5 mu M. PiT2 was analyzed for the first time and showed positive cooperativity in Pi uptake with a half-maximal activity constant for Pi of 163.5 +/- 39.8 mu M. PiT1- and PiT2-mediated Na+-dependent Pi uptake functions were not significantly affected by acidic and alkaline pH and displayed similar Na+ dependency patterns. However, only PiT2 was capable of Na+-independent Pi transport at acidic pH. Study of the impact of divalent cations Ca2+ and Mg2+ revealed that Ca2+ was important, but not critical, for NaPi transport function of PiT proteins. To gain insight into the NaPi cotransport function, we analyzed PiT2 and a PiT2 Pi transport knockout mutant using Na-22(+) as a traceable Na+ source. Na+ was transported by PiT2 even without Pi in the uptake medium and also when Pi transport function was knocked out. This is the first time decoupling of Pi from Na+ transport has been demonstrated for a PiT family member. Moreover, the results imply that putative transmembrane amino acids E-55 and E-575 are responsible for linking Pi import to Na+ transport in PiT2.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据