4.1 Article

Hepatitis B virus DNA in unusual serological profiles of hepatitis B surface antigen-positive sera

期刊

VIRAL IMMUNOLOGY
卷 19, 期 4, 页码 623-629

出版社

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/vim.2006.19.623

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

On the basis of a seroepidemiological survey of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection conducted on 6208 random serum samples from four provinces of Thailand, we found 19 of 246 (7.7%) hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive samples with unusual serological constellations of HBV infection. Ten samples tested positive for HBsAg, anti-HBc (anti-hepatitis B core antibody), and anti-HBs (anti-hepatitis B surface antibody) markers (group 1), 3 specimens were HBsAg and anti-HBs positive without detectable anti-HBc (group 11), and the remaining 6 specimens showed only HBsAg (group 111). In group 1, 7 of 10 HBsAg-positive sera could be confirmed by HBsAg neutralization, yielding positive results for all samples. None of the group 11 sera were available in sufficient amounts for confirmation. In group 111, five of six sera were confirmed by HBsAg neutralization, with four showing a positive reaction. HBV DNA was detected in 7 of 10 (70%) specimens in group 1, in 1 of 3 (33.3%) specimens in group 11, and in 3 of 6 (50%) specimens in group III. On the basis of HBsAg neutralization, HBV DNA was found in five of seven (71.4%) HBsAg-positive samples in group I and in three of four (75%) HBsAg-positive samples in group III, whereas the one confirmed HBsAg-negative sample in group III also remained negative for HBV DNA. Amino acid sequences were compared with those specifying the a determinant of the wild-type virus, particularly focusing on HBV-S protein variations between positions 110 and 160. Among 11 HBV DNA-positive sera, G145A was detected in 2 samples in group 1, with the remaining samples identical to the wild-type virus. These unusual serological profiles may be due to the altered immune response of the host or to HBV variants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据