4.7 Article

Transdermal baicalin delivery using diethylene glycol monoethyl ether-mediated cubic phase gel

期刊

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICS
卷 479, 期 -, 页码 219-226

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2014.12.055

关键词

Monoglyceride; Liquid crystalline phase; Cutaneous absorption; Permeability; Microdialysis

资金

  1. State Education Ministry of the People's Republic of China [NCET08-0898]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81303234]
  3. Youth Scientific Research Foundation from Shanghai Health Bureau [20134q098]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the transdermal permeability of baicalin, a hydrophobic and readily hydrolyzed drug, delivered by glyceryl monooleate (GMO)-based cubic phase gel (CPG) mediated with Transcotol (R) P (TP, diethylene glycol monoethyl ether). A range of CPGs was produced by varying GMO, water, and TP levels. Examination of their physicochemical properties revealed that the optically isotropic CPG showed higher viscosity than lamellar phase gels (LPG), and the baicalin cargo increased CPG viscosity. The GMO: TP ratio and water content also altered viscosity. CPG-mediated delivery increased baicalin's skin permeation, with 76.65- to 200.24-fold higher (p < 0.05) transdermal flux than that of a Carbopol (R)-based hydrogel (HDG), and 6.72- to 17.55-fold (p < 0.05) higher than that of LPG, with the same water content. Rat in vivo microdialysis showed that CPG produced sustained baicalin release, with superior pharmacokinetic parameters to those of HDG. Furthermore, cutaneous drug absorption was more efficient on rat abdominal skin, compared to that in the chest or scapular region. Effective fusion between the CPG lipid matrix and the stratum corneum may explain this enhancement of transdermal permeation. CPG containing TP therefore, achieved excellent transdermal drug delivery and good baicalin stability, indicating that this system represents a promising transdermal delivery vehicle. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据