3.8 Article

Cloning and characterization of novel cathelicidin cDNA sequence of Bubalus bubalis homologous to Bos taurus cathelicidin-4

期刊

DNA SEQUENCE
卷 17, 期 6, 页码 407-414

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10425170600760125

关键词

antimicrobial peptide; cathelicidin; buffalo; cationic protein; cDNA; cloning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cathelicidin synthesized by bone marrow cells plays an important role in neutralizing invading pathogens. In the present study, the myeloid cathelicidin cDNA from Bubalus bubalis has been cloned and characterized. RNA from bone marrow of buffalo ribs was extracted, reverse transcribed and amplified using specific pair of primer designed from published cathelicidin-4 cDNA sequences of Bos taurus popularly known as indolicidin. An expected amplified product of 517 bp was obtained, which was cloned and sequenced. Comparison of buffalo cathelicidin and indolicidin sequences reveal that the open reading frames (ORF) of both these two congeners consist of 435 nucleotides with 28 divergent nucleotides and the translated proteins of 144 amino acid residues. Fourteen amino acid residues were found to be dissimilar between these two congeners. The molecular mass of buffalo cathelicidin calculated from the deduced amino acid sequence was 16.23 kDa, which is in close proximity of indolicidin. The sequence comparison with known B. taurus cathelicidin congeners again show 70.8-92.9%, identity at nucleotides level and 65-88.3% identity at amino acids level. The maximum similarity of buffalo cathelicidin both at nucleotides level (92.9%) and protein level (88.3%) was found to be with indolicidin. Phylogenetic tree analysis at nucleotides and amino acids level indicate that buffalo, cattle, sheep, pig and equine cathelicidin sequences comprise one clade which are distantly related with human, rabbit and murine cathelicidins. It may be reasonably concluded that buffalo possess the ancestral gene of cathelicidin like that of bovine species.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据